| The difference in tone between the movies of MGR and Sivaji, is clear from the
selections featured in the 'Rewind' section this month. While Enga
Veettu Pillai used the double roles for pure entertainment in the story of two brothers,
Gowravam, which has Sivaji playing the roles of a lawyer and his nephew, focusses
on the conflict between them, both in and out of the courtroom. Aspects like romance and
comedy, the staple part of MGR's movies, are relegated to the background and emotions are
at the forefront here.
Barrister Rajnikanth(Sivaji) is a highly respected criminal lawyer who has an undefeated
record in the courtroom. He has raised his brother's son Kannan(Sivaji) ever since he
was a baby and Kannan in turn has the utmost love and affection for him. Rajinikanth's
ego makes him take on the case of Mohandas('Major' Sundarrajan), who has been accused of
killing his wife. Though Mohandas is responsible for his wife's death, he is acquitted
owing to Rajinikanth's mastery of the law. Now, Mohandas is all set to marry a dancer
Kalpana and when she dies(this time of natural causes), he once again turns towards
Rajinikanth for help. Rajinikanth takes up his case again but this time Kannan becomes
the public prosecutor and opposes him.
While the movie has legal issues at its heart, it is less a courtroom drama than a
clash of emotions and values. By showing us the contrasting lifestyles of
the barrister and his nephew, it illustrates their differing values right at the
beginning and sets us up for their conflict. The reason for this conflict(differing
attitudes towards Sundarrajan's guilt) is quite strong and believable.
By selecting a case that is not exactly black and white, the director manages
to introduce an element of suspense into the actual judgement. The fact that the
characters on both sides of the battle have earned our sympathy muddles the issue
further. We would like the barrister to win because of the strength of his charater
while the goodness in Kannan's heart makes us root for him too. Unfortunately, the
actual courtroom scenes do not do justice to this setup. There is no excitement in the
proceedings and the behavior of Rajinikanth after he talks to Sundarrajan about the
latest evidence is not in keeping with his character. The final resolution too is
not completely satisfactory(though Kannan does offer an explanation for the skewed
resolution).
Dialogs are strong and evoke smiles at many places. The explanations Sivaji gives to
justify his values are sensible and make us appreciate his character. Nagesh has several
smart lines and wordplays('maternal uncle' and 'eternal trouble'!). The pain Sivaji
undergoes after Kannan decides to go against him is well brought about his dialogs
to Pandaribai. Similarly, Kannan's respect for his uncle is conveyed very well through
his talks to his lover and other colleagues. The short sequence in the Neeyum
Naanumaa... song sequence where the two Sivajis face off on a chessboard is
nicely done.
By today's standards Sivaji's performance does seem like overacting at several
places but his ability shines through. He distinguishes the two roles effortlessly
and essays them in completely different ways. His performance makes the older lawyer
a memorable character indeed and the line that is displayed after the movie ends fits
the role completely. With him hogging both roles, the others are merely onlookers.
Nagesh plays a role with touches of villainy while Pandaribai, as always, is the
affection wife and mother. Paalootti Valartha... and Neeyum Naanumaa...
are good songs loaded with great lines and meaning from Kannadasan's pen.
|